ANALISIS FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT KEBIJAKAN REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI DI SEKRETARIAT JENDERAL KEMENTERIAN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v6i2.521Keywords:
Policy Implementation, Obstacle Factors, and Administrative ReformAbstract
The focus of this research is to describe the implementation of administrative reform, explain its impeding factors, and propose recommendations in dealing with the obstacles faced by The Secretariat General of Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. Post-positivism with qualitative design method is used for this research. The results show that the contents of the policy become an inhibiting factor, while its contexts do not. There are two proposed recommendations including intensively and massively implementing the joint forum for socialization, internalization, and education to discuss four indicators such as affecting interests, type of benefits, extent of change envision, and program implementors related to administrative reform to a more substantial level instead of formality. In addition, it is highly recommended creating urgency of administrative reform as the main agenda and priority of all organization entitiesReferences
Agustino, Leo. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Cresswell, John W (2017). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. (Terj). Achmad Fawaid. Edisi Keempat. Cet-2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Caiden, Gerald E. (1969). Administrative Reform. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Caiden, Gerald E. (1991). Administrative Reform Comes Of Age. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Dwiyanto, Agus. (2015). Reformasi Birokrasi Kontekstual: Kembali Ke Jalur Yang Benar. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Dwiyanto, Agus. (2016). Memimpin Perubahan di Birokrasi Pemerintahan Catatan Seorang Kritis Seorang Akademisi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Farazmand, Ali. (Eds). (2002). Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Westport: Praeger Publisher.
Eastern Regional Organization For Public Administraion (EROPA), Seminar on Administrative Reform and Innovations, Vol.2: (Kuala Lumpur, Juni 1968).
Gotz, Alexander, Florian Gotz, dan Till Weber. (2018). “Party government and administrative reform: evidence from The German Landerâ€. Journal of Administration & Society. Vol 50. Issue: 6. Page 778-811.
Guo, Baogang. (2017). “China’s administrative governance reform in the era of “new normalâ€. Journal of Chinese of Political Science. Vol 22. Page 357-373.
Grindle, Merilee S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in Third World. New Jersey: Princetown University.
Hamdi, Muchlis dan Halilul Khairi. (2014). “Reformasi Birokrasi: Menuju Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik, dalam Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Edisi 45, Agustus 2014
Haning, Mohamad Tharir. (2015). Reformasi Birokrasi: Desain Organisasi yang Mendukung Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ilmu Giri.
Juwono, Vishnu. (2018). Melawan Korupsi Sejarah Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia 1945-2014. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Kasim, Azhar. (2011). “Kerangka Dynamics Governance Bagi Reformasi Administrasi Negaraâ€. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara dan Manajemen Publik. Vol 1. No.1. Hal.7-13.
Kasim, Azhar. (1998). Reformasi Administrasi Negara sebagai Prasyarat Upaya Peningkatan Daya Saing Nasional. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, FISIP-Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: FISIP-Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta, 21 Maret 1998.
Kim, Sunhyuk dan Chonghee Han. (2015). “Administrative reform in South Korea: New Public Management and the bureaucracyâ€. International of Administrative Science. Vol 8. Issue: 4. Page: 694-712.
Khan, M. (1981). Administrative Reform and Theoretical Perspective. Dacca: Centre For Administrative Studies.
Maksum, Irfan Ridwan. (2010). Organisasi Negara Amuba: Jalinan Sistemik Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Administrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah. Depok: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi-FISIP UI.
Maksum, Irfan Ridwan (2014). “Strategi Reformasi dalam Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia, dalam Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Edisi 45, Agustus 2014.
Mariana, Dede, dkk. (2010). â€Reformasi Birokasi dan Paradigma Baru Administrasi Publik di Indonesiaâ€, dalam Falih Suaedi dan Bintoro Wardiyanto, ed, Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara Reformasi Birokrasi dan E-Governancce. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Nugroho, Riant. (2008). Public Policy. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.
Pollit, Christopher dan Geert Bouckaert. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis New Public Management, Governance, and The Neo Weberian State. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prasojo, Eko. (2006). “Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Beberapa Catatan Kritisâ€. Jurnal Bisnis dan Birokrasi. Vol. XIV. No. 1. Hal 295-304
Rasyid, M. Ryaas. (2013). “Membangun Pemerintahan Yang Baik Melalui Reformasi Administrasi dan Birokrasiâ€, dalam Adriana Elisabeth, dkk, ed, Evaluasi Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: AIPI.
Salomo, Roy Valiant. (2006). Scenario Planinng Reformasi Administrasi Pemerintah Subnasional di Indonesia: Sebuah Grand Strategy Menuju Tahun 2025. Disertasi: FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Turner Mark dan David Hulme. (1997). Governance, Administration, and Development: Making the State Work. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Zauhar, Soesilo. (1994). Reformasi Administrasi: Konsep, Dimensi, dan Strategi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sumber Website:
http://ebtke.esdm.go.id/post/2016/12/08/1470/kementerian.esdm.raih.pnbp.awards.2016 kategori.kontribusi.pnbp.terbesar. diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2018 pukul 13.22 WIB
https://finance.detik.com/energi/d-3795674/jonan-hampir-50-pnbp-2017-dari-kementerian-esdm diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2018 pukul 13.30 WIB).
(http://www.tribunnews.com/kilas-kementerian/2018/10/31/kementerian-esdm-raih-penghargaan-pengelola-pnbp-terbaik diakses pada tanggaal 4 Januari 2019 pukul 10.00 WIB).
https://kelembagaan.ristekdikti.go.id/index.php/2017/04/11/memperbaiki-daya-saing-indonesia/ diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2019 pukul 09.08 WIB.
https://www.inews.id/finance/makro/ini-penyebab-peringkat-daya-saing-indonesia-turun/133025 diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2019 pukul 09.15 WIB.
http://poskotanews.com/2018/12/21/kemnaker-korupsi-dan-birokrasi-hambat-daya-saing-nasional/ diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2019 pukul 09.20 WIB.
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190104192143-85-358599/pnbp-sektor-esdm-lampaui-target-tembus-rp2175-triliun diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2019 Pukul 10.00 WIB.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 Tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi tahun 2010-2025.
Republik Indonesia, Keputusan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Nomor 4573 K/ 70/ MEM/2015 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi (RMRB) KESDM Tahun 2015-2019
Republik Indonesia, Keputusan Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Minneral Nomor 5902 K/ 70/ SJN/ 2016 tentang Road map Reformasi Birokrasi Sekretariat Jenderal KESDM Tahun 2015-2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Please find the rights and licenses in JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI
Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
- License
The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Majalah Ilmiah Bijak permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Majalah Ilmiah Bijak on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy.
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.
