Implementasi Kebijakan Pengungkapan Sukarela Di KPP Pratama Depok Cimanggis Tahun 2022 Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31334/jiap.v2i6.2969Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze how the implementation of the voluntary disclosure policy at Depok Cimanggis Small Taxpayers Office, to identify implementation challenges, and to learn about initiatives taken by the organisation to address these challenges in order to raise tax revenue. This study employs a descriptive qualitative methodology through documentation and interviews with extension staff at KPP Pratama Depok Cimanggis, tax consultants, academics and taxpayers. The findings of this study showed that Depok Cimanggis Small Taxpayers Office implemented its voluntary disclosure policy correctly and consistently supervising the program's completion by incorporating all workers in its socialisation from January to June 2022. It is important to explain to taxpayers how the Voluntary Disclosure Program's rates compare to those of normal rates in order to pique their interest in taking part in the program. Government supervision over taxpayers who violate the tax code must be strong in order to improve compliance. Along with including stakeholders and the outside environment in policy socialization activities that can help voluntary disclosure policies be implemented.References
Ademarta. (2014). Pengaruh Modernisasi Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Terhadap Tingkat Kepatuhan Penguasa Kena Pajak di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) Pratama Padang dan Solok. Jurnal Akuntansi.
Adrian, R. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Tax Amnesty dalam rangka meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak dan penerimaan pajak. Skripsi .
Agustino, L. (2006). Dasar – Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ananti, R. (2019, Maret 6). Peneriman Pajak di Depok Alami Penurunan. Retrieved from Klik Pajak:http://www.klinikpajak.co.id/berita+detail/?id=berita+pajak++peneriman+pajak+di+depok+alami+penurunan
Bunyamin, P., & Wisanggeni, I. (2019). Current Issue Perpajakan. Jakarta : Mitra Wacana Media .
Dahlan, M. (2020). SHADOW ECONOMY, AEOI, DAN KEPATUHAN PAJAK . Scientax: JurnalKajian Ilmiah Perpajakan Indonesia , 39-56.
Devano, S., & Rahayu, S. K. (2006). Perpajakan: konsep, teori dan isu, . Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Dipa, M. (2021, oktober 29). Kepala KPP Depok Cimanggis Sebut Wajib Pajak di Kecamatan Pancoran Mas Paling Patuh Lapor Pajak. Retrieved from Tribunnewsdepok.com: https://depok.tribunnews.com/2021/10/29/kepala-kpp- depok-cimanggis-sebut-wajib-pajak-di-kecamatan-pancoran-mas-paling-patuh- lapor-pajak
Dumilah, A. (2014). Kebijakan Kesehatan: Prinsip dan Praktik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ginting, R., Nugraha, A. E., & Setiawan, D. F. (2017). Analisis Ekspektasi kebijakan: mengukur keberhasilan program Tax Amnesty.
Gunadi. (2006). Reformasi Administrasi Perpajakan dalam rangka kontribusi. Jakarta : Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Perpajakan FISIP UI.
Gunandi. (2013). Panduan Komprehensif Pajak Penghasilan. Jakarta: PT. Niaga Swadaya.
Hariani, A. (2020, April 27). REPORTEfektif-Efisien dengan Kolaborasi. Retrieved from Majalah Pajak: https://majalahpajak.net/efektif-efisien-dengan-kolaborasi/
Harimulyono, N. (2008). Pengaruh Efektivitas Administrasi Perpajakan dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Daerah. Staf Pengajar STIE AL Anwar Mojokerto.
Henry, N. (1988). Administrasi negara dan masalah-masalah kenegaraan. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Hutagaol, J. (2007). Perpajakan: Isu-isu Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Iskandar. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif). Jakarta: GP Press.
Kelmanutu, A. (2022, Maret 8). Walikota Depok dan Forkompimda Lapor SPT, Dikawal Langsung Kakanwil DJP Jabar III. Retrieved from Radar Depok: https://www.radardepok.com/2022/03/walikota-depok-dan-forkompimda- lapor-spt-dikawal-langsung-kakanwil-djp-jabar iii/#:~:text=Penerimaan%20pajak%20Di%20KPP%20Pratama,tumbuh%2021%25%20dari%20tahun%202020.
Kelmanutu, A. (2022, Maret 08). Walikota Depok dan Forkompimda Lapor SPT, Dikawal Langsung Kakanwil DJP Jabar III. Retrieved from Radar Depok: https://www.radardepok.com/2022/03/walikota-depok-dan-forkompimda- lapor-spt-dikawal-langsung-kakanwil-djp-jabar-iii/
Kurniawati, L. (2017). TAX AMNESTY UPAYA MEMPERKUAT PENERIMAAN NEGARASEKTOR PAJAK. e-Journal PKN Stan , Substansi, Volume 1 Nomor 2, 2017 hal 259.
Leo, A. (2008). Dasar –Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta. Lumbantoruan, S. (1997). Ensklopedia Perpajakan. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Mardiasmo. (2016). Perpajakan. Yogyakarta: Edisi Revisi. Penerbit Cv Andi Offser.
Miles, B. M., & Huberman, M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.
Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif 2016. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurdiansyah, R. (2021, Maret 5). Kantor Pajak Depok Optimistis Raih Target Penerimaan 2021. Retrieved from Republika: https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qpi6tn349/kantor-pajak-depok-optimistis- raih-target-penerimaan-2021
Nurmatun, S. (2003). Pengantar Perpajakan. Jakarta: Granit.
OECD. (2015). Update on Voluntary Disclosure Programmes: A pathway to tax compliance.
Pohan, C. A. (2017). Pembahasan Komprehensif Pengantar Perpajakan Teori dan Konsep Hukum Pajak. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Presthus, R. V., & Pfiffner, J. M. (1960). Public administration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
Putra, F. (2001). Paradigma Kritis dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahayu, S. K. (2010). Perpajakan Indonesia: Konsep dan Aspek Formal. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu.
Safri. (2021). EFEKTIFITAS PROGRAM TAX AMNESTY JILID II DAN FAKTOR KEBERHASILAN DAN PERMASALAHAN: PELAJARAN DARI TAX AMNESTY JILID I. Universitas
Dirgantara Marsekal Surya Darma, VOL 12, NO 2; HAL-20.
Samuda, & Asdiyanti, S. Y. (2016). Underground. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, Volume 19, No.1.
Sari , S. (2017). Amnesti Pajak: Sejarah Dan efektivitas di berbagai Negara. 139-147. Setiawan, G. (2004). Impelemtasi dalam Birokrasi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Silaen, S., & Widiyono. (2013). Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial untuk Penulisak Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: In Media.
Subarsono, A. (2005). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta. Sunggono, B. (1994). Hukum dan Kebijaksanaan Publik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sunyoto, S. (2011). Analisis Regresi Untuk Uji Hipotesis. Yogyakarta: Caps.
Syafruddin, Susanti , M., & Wahyuni. (2017). Pengaruh Kewajiban Kepemilikan NPWP, Pemeriksaan Pajak, Dan Penagihan Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan (Studi Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Di Wilayah Kabupaten Sumbawa).
Usman, N. (2002). Konteks Implementasi Berbasis Kurikulum. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn , C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation The Policy Implementation. Administration and Society.
waluyo. (2011). Perpajakan Indonesia. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Widodo, J. (2007). Analisa Kebijakan Publik . Malang: Bayu Media Publishing. Widodo, w. (2010). Moralitas, budaya, dan kepatuhan pajak . bandung: Alfabeta. Winarno, B. (2002). Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Yusdita, E. E. (2017). Studi Interpretif untuk Memahami Perilaku Keengganan Menggunakan E-Billing. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan, 85-92.
Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan.Jakarta: prenadamedia group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Please find the rights and licenses in Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1.License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3.User Rights
Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4.Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5.Miscellaneous
Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
