Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pemungutan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Pedesaan Dan Perkotaan Di Kota Bekasi Tahun 2021

Ahmad Kasyfi Badri Ali, Dwikora Harjo

Abstract


This study aimed to find out the evaluation of the collection of Urban Rural Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2) in Bekasi City in 2021 by using a qualitative descriptive method.The data collection was carried out through field observations at the Bekasi City Regional Revenue Agency (Bependa) office; interviews with informants consisting of the Head of the Tax Collection and Retribution Sub- Section for Bapenda Bekasi City, Academic Lecturers at the Institute of Social Sciences and Management Stiami, and three taxpayers; and documentation. The theory employed was Bridgman & Davis (2000). The measurements of public policy evaluation generally refer to four main indicators, namely: (1) input indicators, (2) process indicators, (3) output indicators, and(4) outcomes indicators. The results of this study, related to the evaluation of the implementation of the Bekasi Urban Rural Land and Building Tax collection, showed that there were still many people who had not been socialized and knew about the payment procedures for Regulation of Mayor of Bekasi City No. 53 of 2019. Then, the obstacle experienced was the people have not been educated about the payment of Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax. Finally, the effort made by the Government of Bekasi City was working with various agencies to conduct socialization to the people of Bekasi City.

This study aimed to find out the evaluation of the collection of Urban Rural Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2) in Bekasi City in 2021 by using a qualitative descriptive method.The data collection was carried out through field observations at the Bekasi City Regional Revenue Agency (Bependa) office; interviews with informants consisting of the Head of the Tax Collection and Retribution Sub- Section for Bapenda Bekasi City, Academic Lecturers at the Institute of Social Sciences and Management Stiami, and three taxpayers; and documentation. The theory employed was Bridgman & Davis (2000). The measurements of public policy evaluation generally refer to four main indicators, namely: (1) input indicators, (2) process indicators,

(3) output indicators, and(4) outcomes indicators. The results of this study, related to the evaluation of the implementation of the Bekasi Urban Rural Land and Building Tax collection, showed that there were still many people who had not been socialized and knew about the payment procedures for Regulation of Mayor of Bekasi City No. 53 of 2019. Then, the obstacle experienced was the people have not been educated about the payment of Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax. Finally, the effort made by the Government of Bekasi City was working with various agencies to conduct socialization to

the people of Bekasi City.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Darwin. 2013. Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Dalam Tataran Praktis. 2nd edBogor: Mitra Wacana Media.

Halim, Abdul. 2012. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Handayaningrat, Soewarno. 1999. Pengantar Studi Ilmu Administrasi Dan. Manajemen. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.

Harjo, D., & Rulandari, N. (2022). Bijak Menerapkan Manajemen Perpajakan. Jogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.

Harjo, Dwikora. 2019. Perpajakan Indonesia. Edited by Supriadi. 2nd ed. Bogor: Mitra Wacana Media. www.mitrawacanamedia.com.

Mahmudi. 2015. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Unit penerbit dan percetakan sekolah tinggi ilmu manajemen YKPN.

Majid, Abdul. 2016. Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maksudi, Beddy Iriawan. 2017. Dasar-Dasar Administrasi Publik. Depok: Rajawali Pers. Cetakan Pertama. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Mardiasmo. 2018. Perpajakan. Terbaru 2018. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.

Rahayu, Siti Kurnia. 2017. Perpajakan Konsep Dan Aspek Formal.Bandung: Rekayasa Sains.

Samudra, Azhari Aziz. 2015. Perpajakan Di Indonesia ; Keuangan, Pajak Dan Retribusi Daerah.PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sari, Diana. 2013. Konsep Dasar Perpajakan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama. Setyawan, Dody. 2017.Pengantar Kebijakan Publik. Malang: Intelegensi Media.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2019. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara. Sugiono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif, Dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta. ———. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Method). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wulandari, Phaureula Artha. 2018. Pajak Daerah Dalam Pendapatan Asli Daerah. Jakarta: Deepublish (CV Budi Utama).

Yanuar, Ikbar. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sosial Kualitatif. Bandung: PTRefika Aditama.

Jurnal

Chandra, Cherry Agustine Runtu, Harijanto Sabijono, and Treesje. 2020. ―Efektivitas Dan Kontribusi Penerimaan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) Terhadap Penerimaan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Di Kota Gorontalo Tahun 2016-2018.‖ JurnalRisetAkuntansi1(3):01–150. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/gc/article/view/28541.

Hartono, S. (2012). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pengalihan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) Sebagai Salah Satu Sumber Pendapataan Asli Daerah Kabupaten Sukoharjo.

Irfan, J. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pemungutan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Di Kecamatan Pagaran Tapah Desa Pagaran Tapah, Desa Kembang Damai Dan Desa Sangkir Indah Kabupaten Rokan Hulu (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).

Kadir, A, I Isnaini, and N Angelia. 2020. ―The Establishment Policy Model ofSale Value of Land Tax Objects and Rural and Urban Sector Buildings (NJOP PBB P2) in Medan.‖ Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) 3 (3): 2421–33. http://www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/1216.

Lintong, Felia, Harijanto Sabijono, and Y.B Meily Kalalo. 2018. ―Analisis Efektifitas Dan Kontribusi Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Pedesaan Dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) Terhadap Peningkatan Penerimaan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan Dan Kota Manado.‖ Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern 13 (4): 200–209. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/gc/article/view/20989.

Mufliha, Zakia, and Selvi. 2021. ―Efektivitas Pemungutan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan Dalam Peningkatan PendapatanAsli Daerah (Studi Kasus Di Bappenda Kabupaten Bogor) Tahun 2018.‖ Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 1 (1): 01–13. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/JUMAIP/article/view/1295.

Ningruma, Dewi Agustya, and Fitria Ulandari. 2021. ―Penetapan Dan Pembayaran Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) Di BPPD Kabupaten Sidoarjo.‖ Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani 8 (1): 49–57. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/reformasi/article/view/1419.

Pradiska, Komang Intan, Krisanti Krisanti, I Nengah Putra Jaya Suryanata, Gede Agus Indrawan, Ni Luh Gede Yastini, and I Gusti

Agung Ayu Suryantini. 2021. ―Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buleleng District Government Policies Regarding the Collection of PBB-P2 During the COVID-19 Pandemic.‖ Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tourism,

Economics, Accounting, Management, and Social Science(TEAMS 2021) 197 (Teams): 617–25. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211124.089.

Prasetyo, U. B. (2018). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemungutan PPN pada BUMN Bidang Jasa Konstruksi (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).

Samanto, Hadi, Hesti Pratiwi, Muhaimin, Wa Ode Rayyani, Rosida Maedina Mahfudnurnajamuddin Agus, R Sudirman, Jurusan Akuntansi, and Universitas Sam Ratulangi. 2019. ―Kontribusi Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan (PBB) Dalam Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Daerah.‖ Amnesty: Jurnal Riset Perpajakan 3 (1): 24–32 https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jrp amnesty/article/view/3402.

Saputri, Yeni, and Tutty Nuryati. 2018. ―Analysis Of Effectiveness And Revenue Contribution Of BPHTB And PBB-P2 On Original Regional Revenue (PAD) Of Bekasi City 2014-2018‖ 2001: 1–16.

Sugiarto, M., Harsasto, P., & Manar, D. (2017). EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN PEMUNGUTAN PAJAK

KOS KOTA SEMARANG (Studi Pada Dinas Pengelolaan Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Kota Semarang). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(2), 71-80.

Windiarti, Wiwik, and Muhammad Sofyan. 2018. ―Analisis Efektivitas Penerimaan Pajak Bumi DanBangunan Kota Depok.‖ Jurnal Ilmiah Ekbank 1(2):2939.https://jurnal.akptahuna.ac.id/index.php/ekbank/article/view/9.

Undang Undang

Peraturan Daerah Kota Bekasi Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan.

Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 58 Tahun 2005 Tentang PengelolaanKeuangan Daerah.

Peraturan Walikota Bekasi Nomor 53 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penetapan Nomor Objek Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan Kota Bekasi

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Keempat atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum danTata Cara Perpajakan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pajak Daerah Dan Retribusi Daerah




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/jiap.v3i1.3134

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31334/jiap.v3i1.3134.g1492

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.