Analisis Pelaksanaan Pertukaran Informasi Otomatis Perpajakan Dari Perspektif Efektifitasnya Meminimalkan Tax Evasion Pada Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Tahun 2018-2020

Sari Narulita, Chairil Anwar Pohan

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the implementation of automatic tax information exchange from the perspective of its effectiveness in minimizing tax evasion at the Directorate General of Taxes in 2018-2020 and to analyze the inhibiting and encouraging entities in the automatic exchange of information in minimizing tax avoidance at the 2018-2020 DGT. The author uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques used in the form of interviews, observation, documentation, and triangulation of sources. The results of the study conclude that the Implementation of Automatic Information Exchange (AEoI) in minimizing tax avoidance and tax evasion so far has been quite effective according to international standards, although there are still many complete data sets that have not been met by partner countries such as Singapore, resulting in the data provided by the partner country being incomplete. can be used by the Indonesian tax authorities. However, the performance of AEoI has not provided optimal results in increasing tax revenue, especially in 2020, its progress is hampered by the Covid 19 Pandemic. On the other hand, the Directorate General of Taxes is still experiencing obstacles. There are four obstacles and challenges in the AEOI, namely: First, the Reciprocity of Information Exchange (Reciprocity). Second, banking tends to be resistant to data access. Third, the lack of technology that supports AEoI. Fourth, the complexity of Conversion of Tax Revenue Data. The Entity that drives this information exchange in minimizing tax avoidance is the existence of an Information Exchange System called the “Common Transmission System (CTS)”.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andres Knobel, M. M. (2014). Automatic Exchange of Information: An Opportunity for Developing Countries to Tackle Tax Evasion and Corruption. Tax Justice Network.

Dev Kar, J. S. (2015). Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2004-2013. Washington DC: Global Financial Integrity.

Hearson, M. (2014). Tax-motivated Illicit Financial Flows: A Guide for Development Paractitioner. Norwey: Bergen U4.

Integrity, G. F. (2014). Illicit Financial Flows: Analytical Methodologies Utilized by Global Financial. In Global Financial Integrity. Washington DC: Global Financial Integrity.

Moleong. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Neuman, W. . (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, 7th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Pohan, C. A. (2017). Manajemen Perpajakan. Strategi Perencanaan Pajak dan Bisnis. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Pohan, C. A. (2019). Pedoman Lengkap Pajak Internasional. Edisi Revisi.Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Pohan, C. A. (2021). Kebijakan dan Administrasi Perpajakan Daerah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Resmi, Siti. 2016. Perpajakan: Teori dan Kasus.Edisi 9 Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Resmi, S. 2011. Perpajakan: Teori dan Kasus Jilid 1, Edisi 66. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Peneltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Unirov, V. (2015). Developing Country Perspectives on Automatic Exchange. Tax Information. Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal (LGD).

JURNAL

Luis E. Quezadaa, Eduardo A. Reinaoa, Pedro I. Palominosa, Astrid

M. Oddershedea..(2019). Measuring Performance Using SWOT Analysis and Balanced Scorecard.

Selvi. (2018). Automatic Exchange Of Information sebagai Big Data di Bidang Perpajakan. http://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/transparansi/article/view/144

Sidarta Akmam.(2017). Pertukaran Otomatis dalam Informasi Perspektif Ekonomi Politik. Jurnal Hubungan International Tahun X no.2 Juli- Desember 2017

Luh Dian Andiani, Gede Adi Yuniarta, I Nyoman Putra Yasa. (2017).

Pengaruh Pengetahuan Sistem Automatic Exchange Of Information (AEOI) dan sanksi perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam membayar dan melaporkan pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Program S1 (Vol:8 No:2 Tahun 2017)

Lusy Rosa Lestari, (2017). Automatic Exchange Of Information Dilihat dari Sudut pandang Account Respesentative (Studi Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pramata Surabaya GubengDanKantorPelayananPajakMadyaSurabaya).https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal- akuntansi/article/view/22046

Iceu Sri Gustina (2019). Analisis Sistem Pertukaran Informasi Otomatis Dan Perlindungan Data nasabah terhadap Keterbukaan Data Dan Informasi Perbankan Dan Perpajakan Indonesia. https://journal.stebisdarussalamoki.ac.id

Stjepan Gadzo Ph,D Irena Klemencic (2017). Effective International

Information Exchange as a key element Of Modern Tax System Promises and piftalls Of the OECD Common Reporting Standard. https://doi.org.103326/pse.412.3

Sumber Lain:

News.ddtc.co.id. (2017). 7 Alasan Pemerintah Buka Akses Data Nasabah. Retrieved from https://news.ddtc.co.id/ini-7-alasan-pemerintah- buka-akses-data-nasabah-10220

Pemeriksaanpajak.com. (2018). Menambah Penerimaan Negara Via AEoI. Retrieved from https://pemeriksaanpajak. com/2018/04/20/ menambah-penerimaan-negara-via-aeoi/

Pemeriksaanpajak.com. (2020). Lewat AEoI Sri Mulyani Klaim Kantongi Jutaan Akun Keuangan Bernilai Puluhan Miliyar Euro. Retrieved from https://pemeriksaanpajak.com/2020/09/22/lewat-aeoi-sri- mulyani-klaim-kantongi-jutaan-akun-keuangan-bernilai-puluhan- miliar-euro/

Www.pajak.go.id. (2020). AEOI dan Kesiapan Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.pajak.go.id/id/artikel/aeoi-dan-kesiapan-indonesia,2020




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/jiap.v3i2.3147

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31334/jiap.v3i2.3147.g1498

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.