The Effect of the Modernization of the Tax Administration System and Tax Understanding Level on the Individual Taxpayer Compliance at the South Lampung Dispenda Office

Authors

  • Dessy Andamisari Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI, Jakarta, 10530
  • Heru Sudinta Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI, Jakarta, 10530
  • Wuwuh Andayani Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI, Jakarta, 10530
  • Santi Dwi Agustin Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI, Jakarta, 10530

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31334/jupasi.v4i1.2312

Keywords:

Tax Administration System, Tax Understanding, Tax Compliance

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the effect of the Tax Administration System and Tax Understanding Level on Individual Taxpayer Compliance at the South Lampung Dispenda Office. This research was quantitative research with a sample of 100 respondents. The data collection was by distributing questionnaires having been tested for their validity and reliability, while the data analysis was carried out using analysis of determination. The results of the study indicated that there was a simultaneous and significant effect between the Tax Administration System and Tax Understanding on the Compliance of Individual Taxpayers. This can be seen based on the F test and the value of Sig. The obtained value was 0.00 where < from 0.00 and the calculated f value was 48,876 > 3.09. This means that the independent variables, namely the Tax Administration System (X1) and Tax Understanding (X2), had a simultaneous effect on the dependent variable, namely Tax Compliance (Y). In the results of the t-test, it is known that the Tax Administration System (X1) variable had a Sig value of 0.000 <0.05 and a t-count of 0.8005> from a t-table of 1.988, then the data was declared influential. This means that the Tax Administration System variable (X2) affected the Tax Compliance variable. In the Tax Understanding variable (X2), the Sig value was 0.000 <0.05 and t count was 30.248 > t table 1.988, then the data could also be said influential. In conclusion, the Tax Understanding variable affected the Tax Compliance variable.

References

Anggara, S. 2012. Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gie, The Liang. 2009. Administrasi Perkantoran Modern. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Gunadi, D. M. 2015. Administrasi Pajak. Jakarta: BPPK DEPKEU RI.

Mardiasmo, 2011. Perpajakan: Cetakan ke-11. Yogyakarta. Andi Yogyakarta.

Nurmantu, S. 2009. Pengantar Perpajakan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Pasolong, H. 2017. Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Priyatno, D. 2016. SPSS Handbook. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.

Pohan, C. A. 2017. Pembahasan Komprehensif Pengantar Perpajakan Teori dan Konsep Hukum Pajak. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Rahayu, S. K. 2010. Perpajakan Indonesia-Konsep dan Aspek Formal. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Rahman, A. 2010. Panduan Pelaksanaan Administrasi Perpajakan untuk Karyawan, Pelaku Bisnis, dan Perusahaan. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Rukajat, A. 2018. Pendekatan Penelitian Kuantitatif, Ed.1 Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utama.

Sarunan, W.K. 2015. Pengaruh Modernisasi Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi dan Wajib Pajak Badan pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Manado. Jurnal EMBA, Vol.2,4, p. 518-526.

Sekaran, U. 2000. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabeta.

Yeremias T. 2014. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik Konsep, Teori dan Isu: Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: PT. Gava Media.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles