Challenges In Doing Education And Communication Related To The Digitalization Of Tax To The Public

Isra Ruddin

Abstract


Digitalization in the field of taxation is very important for the government and society to ensure a more efficient and transparent tax collection process. However, the main challenge in conducting education and communication related to digitalization of taxation is increasing public awareness and understanding of the importance of this process. Limited resources, information, and understanding of technology are also obstacles in conducting effective and targeted education and communication. Therefore, there is a need for consistent and integrated efforts to address this challenge and increase public understanding and participation in tax digitization.

Keywords


Education, Tax Digitalization, Tax Education, Tax Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakic-Miric, N. (2019). Critical Theory of Communication, New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of Internet.

Chandler, D., & Fuchs, C. (2019). Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data. University of Westminster Press.

Fuchs, C. (2015). CULTURE AND ECONOMY IN THE AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

Mosco, V. (2019). To the Cloud Big Data in a Turbulent World

Blackhawk, M. (2019). Federal Indian law as paradigm within public law. Harvard Law Review, 132(7), 1787-1877.

Davidson, S. (2020). Made by a human like you or me: Back to the Greek classics to further develop the rhetorical paradigm of public relations. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101888.

Ferguson, M. A. (2018). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Journal of public relations research, 30(4), 164-178.

Kelly, K. S. (2020). Fund raising and public relations: A critical analysis. Routledge.

Kent, M. L., & Li, C. (2020). Toward a normative social media theory for public relations. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101857.

Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Competing and co-existing. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Shinde, R. S., & Boinwad, D. L. (2019). Paradigm shift in food habits due to stressful life-a research in pune city. Sumedha Journal of Management, 8(3), 112-124.

Yang, A., & Saffer, A. J. (2019). Embracing a network perspective in the network society: The dawn of a new paradigm in strategic public relations. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101843.

Casady, C. B., Eriksson, K., Levitt, R. E., & Scott, W. R. (2020). (Re) defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective. Public Management Review, 22(2), 161-183.

Gruszczynski, L. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and international trade: Temporary turbulence or paradigm shift?. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(2), 337-342.

Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., & Hughes, S. D. (2019). Queer intimacies: A new paradigm for the study of relationship diversity. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(4-5), 556-592.

Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & McLaren, P. (2020). Viral modernity? Epidemics, infodemics, and the ‘bioinformational’paradigm. In Pandemic Education and Viral Politics (pp. 9-40). Routledge.

Kankam, P. K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 85-92.

Meng, J., & Berger, B. K. (2019). The impact of organizational culture and leadership performance on PR professionals’ job satisfaction: Testing the joint mediating effects of engagement and trust. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 64-75.

Leonardi, P. M., & Treem, J. W. (2020). Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1601-1625.

Gora, R., & S Sos, M. M. (2019). Riset kualitatif public relations. Jakad Media Publishing.

Meijer, A. J., Lips, M., & Chen, K. (2019). Open governance: A new paradigm for understanding urban governance in an information age. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 1, 3.

Diana, R. E., & Oktarina, F. (2021). Microhome Design: A New Paradigm of Home Terminology.

Olsen, A. L., Hjorth, F., Harmon, N., & Barfort, S. (2019). Behavioral dishonesty in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 572-590.

Mialon, M. (2020). An overview of the commercial determinants of health. Globalization and Health, 16, 1-7.

Jolly, A. (2022). The Central Asian Paradigm in Anglo-Russian relations, 1885–1895 (Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia).

Semple, T. (2023). Hipsterism: A Paradigm for Modernity (p. 192). Springer Nature.

Nelipa, D. V., Tsvykh, V. F., Zubchyk, A., Sytnyk, G. P., & Hrebonozhko, Y. P. (2020). The New Public Management paradigm as a further interaction of the public and private sectors. Revista San Gregorio, 1(42).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.