Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Tata Kelola Organisasi Untuk Mitigasi Risiko: Model Hourglass

Daryanto Hesti Wibowo

Abstract


Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly spreading across organizations. However, this development must be followed by an awareness of the risks from the use of AI. AI risk management ensures the development of socially responsible AI in society 5.0. The purpose of this literature study is to examine a comprehensive governance model with the AI Hourglass Model governance framework. This AI governance allows organizations to develop their business based on risk. This framework is designed to help organizations implementing AI systems incorporate risk management principles into practice and align AI systems and processes with existing standards. Risk management in this study refers to the COSO ERM Framework. The Hourglass Model framework includes governance requirements at the environmental, organizational, and AI system levels. Risk mitigation is attempted at each layer of AI governance in this model to ensure sustainable organizational governance. This model sheds light on the systemic nature of AI governance and opens new research avenues into its practical implementation, the mechanisms connecting different layers of AI governance, and the management dynamics of governance actors. This study provides an initial overview for organizational decision makers to consider the elements of governance needed to ensure social acceptance, mitigate risks, and optimally develop the potential of AI.


Keywords


AI, Governance, Organizations, Risks

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butcher, J., & Beridze, I. (2019). What is the State of Artificial Intelligence Governance Globally? RUSI Journal, 164(5–6), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260

Dignum, V. (2022). Responsible Artificial Intelligence --- From Principles to Practice. ACM SIGIR Forum, 56(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582524.3582529

Eitel-Porter, R. (2021). Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6

Fanto, J. (2023). Compliance risk management. Broker-Dealer Compliance, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889576.00008

Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., & Viljanen, M. (2022). Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance. (2022). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00335

Ramírez, R., & Selsky, J. W. (2016). Strategic Planning in Turbulent Environments: A Social Ecology Approach to Scenarios. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.09.002

Seppälä, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). From Ethical AI Principles to Governed AI. Forty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, (January), 1–17.

Whittlestone, J., Alexandrova, A., Nyrup, R., & Cave, S. (2019). The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions. AIES 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314289


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.