ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP KEADILAN DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN KEBERATAN PAJAK PADA DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PAJAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v3i1.98Keywords:
objection, equity, DGT, tax courtAbstract
This research is performed to analyze if Tax Objection process has fulfilled the equity principle, to find obstacles in fulfilling the equity principle in the Objection process and also to find the ideal model of Tax Objection Process so that equity principle can obtained by the tax payers. The research is performed using qualitative method through observation, documentation study and interviewing 10 experienced informants in taxation. According to the research known that the equity principle has not been fulfilled in the Objection process, these happens because of some obstacles for instance the psychological matter met by the tax authority whom have to fulfill revenue target from tax payers, lack of understanding from both Tax payers and fiscus regarding tax regulations, the DGT internal policy to “Decline any of Tax Objection request from Tax payers and also traumatic problem of fiscus for having GT-like case and/or criminalization case of tax authority by the DGT. Finally, the ideal model proposal concerning Tax Objection Institution is to shifted from DGT to be directly under the Ministry of Finance or upgraded the institution to be a pure court in the environment of justice power by establishing Tax Court Level I and the existing Tax Court to be a Higher Tax Court.
References
Buku :
Abdullah, H. Rozali. 1992. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
Atmosudirdjo, Prajudi. 1988. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Brotodihardjo, Santoso. 1989. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak. Bandung: RafikaAditama.
Caiden, E. Gerald. 1991. Administrative Reform Come of Age. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Denzin, K. Norman danYvonna S. Lincoln. 2004. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London. Sage Publication.
Dicey. 1959. An Introduction to The Study of The Law of Constitution. London: Mac Milon.
Guba, G. Egon dan Yvanna S. Lincoln. 195. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hill California: Sage Publications.
Gunadi. 2001. Panduan Komprehensif, Pajak Penghasilan. Jakarta: Multi Utama Consulfindo.
Hill, Michael dan Peter Hupe. 2002. Implementing Public Policy, Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage Publications.
Ismail, Tjip. 2008. PengaturanPajak Daerah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Jellow Printing.
-------. 1998. Anjing Menggonggong Kafilah Berlalu. Jakarta: (t.p.).
Mansury.1994. Panduan Konsep Utama Pajak Penghasilan Indonesia. Jilid I. Jakarta: Bina Rena Pariwara.
-------. 1996. Pajak Penghasilan Lanjutan. Jakarta: Ind-Hill Co.
Marshall, Catherine dan Gretchen B. Rossman. 1989. Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Musgrave, A. 1976.Public Finance in Theory and Practice.Third Edition. (t.t.): McGraw Hill Kogakusha Ltd.
Newman, Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Nowak, Norman. D. 1970. Tax Administration in Theory and Practice with Special Reference to Chile. New York: Preager Publishers.
Patton, Michael Quin. 2000. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Method. 3rd Edition. London: Sage Publication.
Peters, B. Gay. 197. The Politics of Bureaucracy, A Comparative Perspective. New York: Linguain.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2006. IlmuHukum. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bhakti.
-------. 2009. Hukum dan Perilaku. Jakarta. Kompas Media Nusantara.
-------. 2009. Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rawls, John. 2006. A Theory of Justice: Teori keadilan Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Politik Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Negara. Yogyakarta:PustakaPelajar.
Robbins, Stephan P. 2001. Organizational Behaviour.9th Edition. New Jersey. Prentice Hall International Inc.
-------. and Neil Barnwell. 2002. Organizational Theory, Concepts and Cases. New South Wales: Prentice Hall.
Santosa, Panji. 2008. Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Bandung: RafikaAditama.
Siahaan, Marihot P. 2010. Hukum Pajak Material. Yogyakarta: Penerbit GrahaIlmu.
Soemitro, Rochmat. 1976. Masalah Peradilan Administrsi dalam Hukum Pajak Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco.
Wallschutzky, Ian. 1993. Minimizing Evasion and Avoidance, Lesson from Australia. Bath: Fiscal Publication
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan :
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 setelah Amandement I, II, III, IV dan V.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983, Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1994, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2000 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2009 No. 62. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 4999.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983, Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1991, Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1994 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2000 tentang Pajak Penghasilan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2008 No. 133. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 4893.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dari KKN. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 3851.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002 No. 27. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 4189.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 4899.
-------. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara stdt Undang-Undang No. 51 Tahun 2009. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI No. 5079
Sumber Lain :
Gunadi. 2004. Reformasi Administrasi Perpajakan Dalam Rangka Kontribusi Menuju Good Governance, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Luar Biasa Perpajakan FISIP UI. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Kartasasmita. (Penj.). 1998. Tempat dan Tugas dari Ilmu Pengetahuan Pajak (Pidato H. J. Hofstra pada Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Hukum Pajak Universitas Leiden Belanda 7 Oktober 1996). Belanda: Universitas Leiden.
Mangkuprawira, Eddy. 2011. Tesis: Proses Keberatan Pajak Sebagai Upaya Mencapai Keadilan bagi Wajib Pajak Menuju Good Governance Studi Kasus pada Pengadilan Pajak. Jakarta: STIAMI.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Please find the rights and licenses in JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI
Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
- License
The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Majalah Ilmiah Bijak permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Majalah Ilmiah Bijak on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy.
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.
