Konflik dan Perubahan Kebijakan di Pegunungan Karst Kendeng: Narasi Belief System dalam Advocacy Coalitioan Framework
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the dynamic of environmental policy making in the effort of attaining sustainable development. Using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as a framework of analysis, our study was conducted in the Kendeng environmental conflict, Rembang Regency. Utilised both primary and secondary data on conflict properties from cement industry’s proponents and opponents, researchers obtained vigorous data and evidence through which the ACF may offer a comprehensive explanation on policy process and change.
Finding shows that the coalition of actor has a pivotal role to influence value and behaviour among policy actors in the Kendeng environmental conflict. The result of this study fills the lacuna of research which focuses the main discussion on advocacy coalition actor-based policy analysis. It also offers a policy agenda focusing on the belief system actor-based policy analysis in which Government of Indonesia worth to consider in the policy making process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ainuson, K. (2009). An Advocacy Coalition Approach to water policy change in Ghana: a look at belief systems and policy oriented learning. Journal of African Studies and Development, 1(2), 16–27.
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. (2014). Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. Theories of the policy process. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 59–103). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
Bryman, Alan. (2012). Social Reseach Methods 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press
C. M. Weible, P. A. Sabatier, K. M. (2009). Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the AdvocacynCoalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(121–140).
Dunn, W. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Publik (ke-5). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Elliott, C. (2000). Forest certification: a policy perspective. http://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/000825
Elliott, C., & Schlaepfer, R. (2001). Understanding forest certification using the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(3–4), 257–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00043-0
Han, H., Swedlow, B., & Unger, D. (2014). Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 0(February 2015), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.857065
Henry, A. D., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 299–312. http://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.941200
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.
Kingiri, A. N. (2014). Comparative Strategic Behavior of Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Brokers: The Case of Kenya’s Biosafety Regulatory Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 373–395. http://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.942569
Leong, C. (2015). Persistently Biased: The Devil Shift in Water Privatization in Jakarta. Review of Policy Research, 32(5), 600–621.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organization.
Maribeth, erb, (2016). Mining and the conflict over values in Nusa Tenggara Timur Province,astern Indonesia. The Exrtative Industries dan Society, 3 (370-382)
Nohrstedt, D. (2010). Do Advocacy Coalitions Matter? Crisis and Change in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 309–333. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun038
Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 21–64). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
Pal, L. (2014). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times. Toronto: Nelson Education.
Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. UK: Edward Elgar Publisihing.
Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals . California: University California Press
.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition framework. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sanders, Anna P.P. et all. (2017). Guinea pig or pioneer: Translating global environmental objectives through to local actions in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia’s REDD+ pilot province. Global Environment Change, 42 (68-81)
Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3), 243–270. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000289
Suyanto, Bagong & Sutinah (ed.).,(2007). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Jakarta: Kencanainu
Weible, C. M. (2006). An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95–117. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj015
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & DeLeon, P. (2011). A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
Weible, C., & Sabatier, P. (2006). A Guide to Advocacy Coalition Framework. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/trans.v2i1.417
Copyright (c) 2019 Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi
Email :[email protected]
Website:https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/transparansi
LISTED & INDEXED :
|
|
|
