Kapasitas Bisnis Pemerintah Desa dalam Perspektif Business-Government Relationship Pasca Implementasi Otonomi Desa (Kasus di Kabupaten Banyumas)

Denok Kurniasih, Paulus Israwan Setyoko, M Imron

Abstract


The Indonesian Governments policies after the implementation of village autonomy are directed to villages business development. Village governments duties and functions are not only related to administrative matters anymore, but also in operation of villages business. This shows that there is a developing business commitment in Indonesia. The research result shows that the Business-Government Relationship in Indonesia has changed from one way to mutual interaction, as shown with the development of Public Sector Entrepreneurship and business commitment in village government environment. Both factors evidently improve the capacity of business, which begins to be developed by the Indonesian Government at all levels. The development of Public Sector Entrepreneurship is shown with the business creativity, business cooperation, and professionalism of village government in governments business management. Meanwhile, local governments business commitment is shown with support of policies, funding and human resources in governments business management. Governments business capacity is shown with efficiency, effectiveness and economy (value for money) achieved by governments business unit. In Indonesia, particularly in Banyumas Regency, village autonomy has given opportunity for the development of Business-Government Relationship at local level.

Keywords


Busieness Goverment Relationship; Government’s Business Capacity; Business Commitment; Public Sector Entrepreneurship

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy, SmallBusiness Economics, 28(2–3), 109–122.

Barzelay, M. & Thompson, F. (2006). Responsibility Budgeting in the Air Force Materiel Command, Public Administration Review, 66(1):127–38.

Botric, V. & Bozic, L.(2016). Business Goverment Relationship in European Post Transition Countries: DO Innovators Get The Worse and of A Stick, Translylvanian Review of Administrative Science, 49: 5-21.

Dai, W. & Si, S. (2018). Government Policies and Firm ‘Entrepreneurial Orientation: Strategic Choice and Institutional Perspectives, Journal of Business Research, 93: 23-36.

Debbie, Robert.A & Felix, Edoho.M. (2018). Business and Government Relations in Africa, Routledge, New York and London.

Dhliwayo, S. (2017). Defining public-sector entrepreneurship: A conceptual operational construct, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20 (10): 1–11.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

Fitriati, Rahma. (2015). Menguak Daya Saing UMKM Industri Kreatif, Sebuah Riset Tindakan berbasis Soft Systems Methodology, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Fu, Weihui & Deshpande Satish.P. (2014). The Impact of Caring Climate, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Job Performance of Employees in China’s Insurance Company, Journal Business Ethic, 124: 324-339.

Frederickson, H. G. (2010) Social Equity and Public Administration: Origins, Developments, and Applications, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Gao, Y., Lin, L. Y., & Yang, H. (2017). What's the value in it? Corporate giving under uncertainty, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1), 1–26.

Ghosh, M., & Whalley, J. (2008). State owned enterprises, shirking and trade liberalization. Economic Modelling, 25(6), 1206–1215. .Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69:1 pp3–19.

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.

Inwood, G.J. (2012). Understanding Canadian Public Administration: An Introduction Theory and Practice, Toronto: Pearson, 2012.

Jørgensen, T. B. & Bozeman, B. (2002) Public Values Lost? Comparing Cases on Contracting Out From Denmark and the United States. Public Management Review, 4:1 pp63–81.

Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3), 297–317.

Kearney, C., R. Hisrich & F. Rochie. (2008). ‘‘Facilitating public sector corporate entrepreneurship process: A conceptual model’’. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 15: 275–299.

Klein, P.G., Mahoney, J.T., McGahan, A.M., & Pitelis, C.N. (2010). Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship, European Management Review, 7: 1-15.

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Linder, S., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Agency Theory. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (hal. 344–350).

Loderer, C., Roth, L., Waelchli, U., & Joerg, P. (2010). Shareholder value: Principles, declarations, and actions. Financial Management, 39(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01064.x.

Loderer, C., Roth, L., Waelchli, U., & Joerg, P. (2010). Shareholder value: Principles, declarations, and actions, Financial Management, 39(1), 5–32.

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Myths in Risk and Innovation. London: Anthem Press.

McGahan, A.M., Zelner, B.A., & Barney, J.B. (2013) Entrepreneurship in the public interest: Introduction to the public issue, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1): 1–5.

Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779–790.

Reinhart, C. & K. G. Rogoff, (2009), This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sama, H.K., Ndunguru, P.C., Baisi, M.D. (2013). Entrepreneurial Government: Causal Relationship between Transaction Costs and Value for Money, International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), 2(9), 63-74.

Thomson, F. & Rizova, P. (2013). Understanding and Creating Public Value, Business is The Engine, Government The Flywheel (and also The Regulator), Public Management Review, 17(4): 565-586.

Wainwright, Bronwyn. (2019). What is Employee Commitment?, Effectory.com.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/transparansi.v3i1.927

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31334/transparansi.v3i1.927.g522

Copyright (c) 2020 Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats


Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi

ISSN Media cetak2085-1162

ISSN Media online2622-0253

Email :[email protected]
Website:https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/transparansi

LISTED & INDEXED :