Dynamic Capability on Business Performance through Ambidextrous Innovation in The Coffee Business

Authors

  • Eva Rachmawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Vanessa Gaffar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Lili Adi Wibowo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Puspo Dewi Dirgantari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v22i2.5763

Keywords:

Dynamic Capability; Ambidextrous Innovation; Business Performance; Coffee Business; PLS SEM;

Abstract

Objectives: In the context of rising global competition and shifting consumer demands, coffee enterprises face increasing pressure to innovate while maintaining consistent business performance. This study investigates the role of dynamic capabilities in enhancing business performance through the mediating mechanism of ambidextrous innovation within the Indonesian coffee industry. Methodology: Adopting a quantitative, explanatory research design, the study collected primary data from 362 decision-makers representing various types of coffee businesses, including cafés, roasteries, and producers. Using structural equation modeling with Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM), the study tested both direct and indirect relationships among dynamic capabilities, ambidextrous innovation, and business performance. Finding: The findings reveal that dynamic capabilities—specifically sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring—positively influence both exploitative and explorative innovation strategies, which in turn significantly improve multiple dimensions of business performance. Moreover, ambidextrous innovation was found to partially mediate the relationship between dynamic capabilities and performance outcomes, underscoring its strategic importance in resource-constrained environments. The study contributes to the theoretical development of dynamic capabilities and innovation management by extending the application of Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory to the context of small and medium-sized enterprises in emerging markets. Conclusion: It also offers practical insights for managers and policymakers seeking to foster innovation-driven growth in the agri-food and service sectors.

References

Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2024). The role of innovation and dynamic capabilities in sustaining competitive advantage in volatile industries. Journal of Business Research, 172, 113209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113209

Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Danso, A. (2025). Green ambidexterity and sustainable firm performance: The mediating role of innovation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3594

Aini, N., & Yuliaji, T. (2024). Causal research design in SME innovation studies: Applications in emerging markets. Journal of Business and Management Research, 16(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBMR-2024-0015

Aini, N., & Yuliaji, T. (2024). Causal research design in SME innovation studies: Applications in emerging markets. Journal of Business and Management Research, 16(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBMR-2024-0015

Alhammadi, A., Al-Emadi, A., & Khan, M. (2024). Configurational approaches in strategic management research: A systematic review. Management Decision, 62(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2022-1245

Anggadwita, G., Luturlean, B. S., Ramadani, V., & Ratten, V. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation strategies for SME performance in emerging markets. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(6), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2021-0043

Artika, R., Nugroho, T., & Prasetyo, A. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and strategic adaptation in emerging markets: Evidence from Indonesian SMEs. Journal of Business Strategy and Innovation, 15(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/xxxx

Baía, E., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and performance: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. European Business Review, 31(3), 382–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-07-2017-0135

Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business model innovation and organizational ambidexterity: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 99, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.033

Budiman, A., Syafri, M., & Kurniawan, D. (2025). Innovation strategies and dynamic capabilities in Indonesian coffee SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 56(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2025.100234

Chang, W. (2022). Linking innovation ambidexterity to firm performance: Evidence from Asian SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 139, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.021

Chigori, T., Moyo, M., & Hove-Sibanda, P. (2024). Ambidexterity, innovation, and SME growth in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2023-0250

Choi, S. B. (2020). Resource-based perspectives on innovation and resilience: Extending COR theory to firms. Sustainability, 12(18), 7358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187358

Choi, S. B. (2020). Resource-based perspectives on innovation and resilience: Extending COR theory to firms. Sustainability, 12(18), 7358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187358

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Haider, S., Ahmed, I., & Ullah, S. (2024). Testing mediation models in dynamic capability research: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2023-0145

Haider, S., Ahmed, I., & Ullah, S. (2024). Testing mediation models in dynamic capability research: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2023-0145

Handini, R., Putri, Y. D., & Laksono, B. (2021). Innovation strategies of Indonesian SMEs in the global market. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-02-2021-0010

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Indriyani, W., Pramudiana, S., & Wibowo, H. (2022). Measuring dynamic capabilities, ambidextrous innovation, and firm performance: Scale development and validation. Journal of Management Development, 41(7), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2021-0180

Kimani, E., & Otinga, H. (2019). Resource-based view and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(4), 1–12.

Mahmud, F., Suryani, T., & Alam, S. (2024). Ambidextrous innovation as a mediator of dynamic capabilities and firm growth. Management Science Letters, 14(5), 2091–2104. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl

Nasution, A., Lubis, H., & Situmorang, Z. (2025). Addressing multicollinearity in PLS-SEM: Evidence from Indonesian SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-04-2024-0062

Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Luo, Y. (2019). Toward a configurational perspective of dynamic capabilities and firm performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(3), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0064

Pertheban, K., Maniam, B., & Sulaiman, M. (2023). Structural equation modeling with PLS: Applications in management and business research. Journal of Applied Structural Modeling, 12(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JASM-2023-0032

Ramos, P., Costa, C., & Lopes, A. (2021). Specialty coffee consumption and cultural trends: A global overview. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 24(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2020.1859458

Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2020). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(6), 508–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12546

Rossignoli Cevallos, C., & Guevara Sánchez, A. (2024). Resource orchestration and innovation capability in agri-food entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 25(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750323110000

Saddam, M., Rahman, A., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Ambidextrous innovation and organizational sustainability: A mediating approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957523112200

Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, M. H., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2023). Linking dynamic capabilities and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(6), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0190

Santoro, G., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2021). The role of ambidextrous innovation in firm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. International Marketing Review, 38(6), 1279–1304. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2020-0079

Sari, M., Rahmawati, D., & Setiawan, H. (2024). Testing mediation and moderation in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for innovation researchers. International Journal of Innovation Management, 28(4), 2450007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919624500079

Sari, N., Dewi, F., & Hartono, M. (2024). Reconfiguring capabilities for sustainable growth: Evidence from Indonesian SMEs. Small Business Economics, 63(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00721-4

Sijabat, R., Hutabarat, L., & Pasaribu, A. (2021). Dynamic capability and ambidextrous innovation for sustainable SME performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 24(6), 1–12.

Sijabat, R., Hutabarat, L., & Pasaribu, A. (2021). Dynamic capability and ambidextrous innovation for sustainable SME performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 24(6), 1–12.

Sudarmaji, E., Prabowo, R., & Nugroho, A. (2019). Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of innovation and performance in Indonesian SMEs. International Journal of Innovation, 7(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.345

Sudarmaji, E., Prabowo, R., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Research methodology in SME studies: Sampling strategies and data collection. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(6), 1–12.

Suprapto, R., Yuliani, L., & Kurniawan, P. (2024). Testing mediation of innovation in the dynamic capability–performance relationship. Journal of Business and Management Research, 12(2), 88–102.

Syofya, H. (2023). Building resilience in Indonesian SMEs: Strategic roles of government policy and innovation. International Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2023

Trieu, V. H., Do, T. H., & Nguyen, L. H. (2023). Data screening techniques in quantitative business research. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2198743. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2198743

Triono, H., & Kurniawan, A. (2019). Leadership and knowledge management as drivers of ambidextrous innovation. International Journal of Business Excellence, 17(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.100234

van Lieshout, S., Nijssen, E. J., & Hillebrand, B. (2021). Ambidexterity and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(4), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12592

Wan, J., & Chun, J. (2025). Conservation of resources theory in organizational resilience and innovation: Extending the framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2745

Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). The role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance: Evidence from SMEs in emerging economies. Information & Management, 59(4), 103628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103628

Wibisono, D., Ramadhani, R., & Putra, A. (2024). Exploitative and explorative innovation: Balancing strategies in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Development, 43(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-2023-0145

Yu, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). The impact of dynamic capabilities on ambidextrous innovation and firm performance: Evidence from South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1656331

Yu, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). The impact of dynamic capabilities on ambidextrous innovation and firm performance: Evidence from South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1656331

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

Issue

Section

Articles