Implementasi Tata Kelola Kolaborasi Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Digitalisasi Pelayanan Publik Pada Smart City Jakarta

Ahmadi Aidi, Agus Budiwaluyo, Redjeki Agoestyowati, Ahmad Junaidi

Abstract


The topic that will be studied in this paper regarding collaborative governance is a decision-making approach, in the form of a series of joint activities in which partners produce common goals and strategies and share responsibility for sharing resources. Collaborative governance focuses on solving problems that occur with a partnership, synergy and mutual trust approach. Collaborative governance in Jakarta is implemented in technological transformation from analog to digital processes which is manifested in digitizing the quality of public services. This topic is interesting for study because it is motivated by the results of Stephen Page's research in 2020, a human resources development consulting agency based in London, England, stating that collaboration is the dominant factor and much needed for improving public services.

Phenomena that occur in public services in Jakarta include service discrimination, the lack of certainty about time and costs and the low level of public satisfaction with public services, which raises the question of what concrete steps the Jakarta government will take to address these public service problems. The Office of Communication, Information and Statistics (Diskominfotik) created a main platform for implementing Smart City in Jakarta, an integrated digital service innovation, which is a novelty for the rise of the spirit of digital transformation with the hashtag #Collaboration City#.

Sourced from the Jakarta Smart City Annual Report 2022, the empirical conditions seen in the field illustrate that digitalization of public services has used data as the main force to provide services that are right on target. Since 2022, more than 60 integrated public service digital applications have served 24,870 public complaints and 338,039 Jakarta resident IDs have been successfully verified.

The conclusion is that Jakarta has implemented collaborative governance in the process of drafting public policies so that it has succeeded in improving the quality of public services.


Keywords


Collaboration, digitalization, smart city.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agranoff R. and Mcguire, M. (2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies For Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (Eds). (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. London: Routledge.

Busch, P. A., Henriksen, H. Z., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). Opportunities and challenges of digitized discretionary practices: a public service worker perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 547–556.

Cabrilo, S, Lela Nesic, Slavica Mitrovic, 2014, Study on human capital gaps for effective innovation strategies in the knowledge era, Journal of intellectual capital.

Chen, shupping, Xia Chen, Qiang Chen. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of Financial Economics 95, 41-61.

Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2019). Contributors and free-riders in collaborative governance: A computational exploration of social motivation and its effects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 394–413.

Chris Ansell & Alison Gash, 2012, Stewards, Mediators, and Catalysts: Toward a Model of Collaborative Leadership, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 17(1), 2012, article 7.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

Davies, Althea L. and Rehema M. White (2012). Collaboration in natural resource governance: Reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland’, Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 160–169.

Emerson, Kirk dan Nabatchi, T. 2015, Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Head of Governance, EMEA, Nasdaq Center for Corporate Governance · Senior Compliance Consultant · Legal and Compliance Officer.

Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 2(3),337–358 infrastructures”, paper presented at the 13th European Conference of Information.

Komninos (2011) Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence.

Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.25, Juni 2012, 93-95. Routledge.

Kudyba, S., Fjermestad, J., & Davenport, T. (2020). A research model for identifying factors that drive effective decision-making and the future of work. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0130.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad.2007. Metode Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi Untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Larsson, B., & Jacobsson, B. (2013). Discretion in the “Backyard of Law”: Case handling of debt relief in Sweden. Professions and Professionalism, 3(1).

Lev Manovich ,2002, The Language of New Media , University of California, San

Maxi Egeten, (2015), Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kota Manado. Jurnal Administrasi Publik UNSRAT.

Meijer, A. J, Curtin D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.

Nygren, K. G., AXelsson, K., & Melin, U. (2013). Public e-services from inside: A case study on technology’s influence on work conditions in a government agency.

Panourgias, Nikiforos S (2015). , Capital markets integration: A sociotechnical study of the development of a cross-border securities settlement system : Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 99, October 2015, Pages 317-338

Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019). Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101377.

Stephen Page London, England, United Kingdom · Governance Consultant·

Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., & Hedstro¨m, K. (2016). " The computer says no!"–A case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. In Paper presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.