Implementasi Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Penggunaan Dana Hibah Rehablitasi Dan Rekonstruksi di Kabupaten Agam Tahun 2022

Nugraha Febriansyah, Pandoyo Pandoyo

Abstract


Agam Regency is one of the areas with high disaster intensity which has implications for both material and non-material losses so that post-disaster rehabilitation and reconstruction are needed in Agam Regency. The problem in this study is that the management of grant funds in Agam Regency has not been managed properly. The purpose of this study is to determine the monitoring and evaluation of the Implementation of the Use of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Grant Funds in Agam Regency in 2022. The theory used in this study is Dunn's evaluation theory which includes planning, implementation, and reporting. The method used in this study is qualitative with a case study approach. The data analysis technique used in this study refers to Cresswell & cresswell (2018) which consists of several processes, namely Organize and prepare the data for analysis, Read or look at all the data, Start coding all of the data, Generate a description and themes, Representing the description and themes, and interpretation. The results of the study found that monitoring and evaluation of the Use of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Grant Funds in Agam Regency in 2022 through planning, implementation, and reporting. The results of the implementation of the use of grant funds cannot be implemented optimally due to the limited time given in the use of grant funds. Supporting and inhibiting factors in policy implementation consist of internal and external factors. The recommendation of this study is the need for strengthening commitment from stakeholders, strengthening cross-sector coordination, and increasing transparency and accountability

Keywords


Monitoring and Evaluation; Rehabilitation and Reconstruction; Disaster Management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul_Wahab, Solichin. 2012. Analisis Kebijakan dari Formulasi ke Penyusunan Model-Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Cetakan ketiga Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Creswell, W. John, and J. David Creswell. 2018. 53 Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative Adn Mixed Methods Approaches.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. 2007. Encyclopedia of Publik Administration and Publik Policy, Second Edition (Print Version) New Publik Service: Serving Not Steering. Expanded. New York: M.E. Sharpc, Inc.

Dunn, William. 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press

Dye, Thomas R. (1995). Understanding Publik Policy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Edwards III, George C. (1980). Implementing Publik Policy. Washington D.C: Congressional Quartely, Inc

Fendel, E. M., van Oosterom, P., & Zlatanova, S. 2005. Geo-Information for Disaster Management. Berlin: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (Eds.). (2007) Handbook of Publik Policy Analysis Theory, Politics, and Methods. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.

Grindle, M.S, (ed)., (1997). Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Publik Sektors of Developing Countries. Boston, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.

Grindle, Merilee S., (1980). Politics and Policy Implementations in the Third Word. New Jersey: Princetown University Press.

Henry, N. 2018. Publik Administration And Publik Affairs. Thirteenth. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Islamy, M. Irfan.. 2014. Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., Stufflebeam, D. L., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, 117-141.

Mardikanto, T. (2011). Metoda penelitian dan evaluasi pemberdayaan masyarakat: untuk akademisi, praktisi dam peminat pemberdayaan masyarakat.

Mazmanian, Daniel and Paul A, Sabatier, (1983). Implementation and Publik Policy Glenview, III: Scott, Foresman.

Moleong, L. J., 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Satake, K., McLean, C., & Alcántara-Ayala, I. 2018. “Understanding Disaster Risk: The Role of Science and Technology.” Journal of Disaster Research 13(7): 1168–76.

Seepersad, J., & Henderson, T. H. (1984). Evaluating extension programmes. Faculty Research, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Faculty of Food and Agriculture, The University of the West Indies.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. 19th ed. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Strauss, Anselm dan Juliet Corbin. 1977. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif: Tata langkah dan Teknik-teknik Teoritisasi Data, terjemahan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31334/reformasi.v12i1.4687

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi : Jurnal Ilmiah untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

JURNAL REFORMASI ADMINISTRASI
Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani

ISSN : 2355-309X (Cetak), 2622-8696 (media online)
Email : [email protected] / [email protected]
Website: http://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/reformasi/index

 

 INDEXED BY :