Implementasi ISO 27037:2012 dalam Penanganan Bukti Elektronik Forensik Digital di Laboratorium Barang Bukti Elektronik Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31334/p1h8xg09Keywords:
ISO 27037:2012, forensik digital, bukti elektronik, laboratorium forensicAbstract
ISO 27037:2012 merupakan standar internasional yang memberikan panduan dalam identifikasi, pengumpulan, akuisisi, dan pelestarian bukti elektronik untuk keperluan forensik digital. Standar ini menjadi acuan penting dalam memastikan keabsahan dan integritas bukti elektronik yang digunakan dalam proses investigasi hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penerapan
standar ISO 27037:2012 dalam penanganan bukti elektronik forensik digital di Laboratorium Barang Bukti Elektronik (LBBE) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Jakarta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik studi kasus yang melibatkan analisis mendalam terhadap prosedur dan praktik yang diterapkan di Laboratorium Barang Bukti Elektronik (LBBE) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Jakarta, meliputi wawancara, observasi, dan analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan ISO 27037:2012 di Laboratorium Barang Bukti Elektronik (LBBE) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Jakarta telah dilaksanakan dengan baik dan konsisten, namun masih terdapat beberapa tantangan dalam implementasi, seperti keterbatasan sumber daya manusia yang tersertifikasi serta perlunya peningkatan teknologi pendukung yang berhubungan juga dengan ketersediaan anggaran. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya strategi menyeluruh yang mencakup penguatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia melalui pelatihan dan sertifikasi, modernisasi perangkat forensik, optimalisasi koordinasi internal, harmonisasi regulasi, serta penguatan kerja sama lintas lembaga dan internasional. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting dalam memahami efektivitas penerapan ISO 27037:2012 di lingkungan instansi penegakan hukum di Indonesia dan menawarkan rekomendasi untuk perbaikan lebih lanjut.
References
Abdullah, R. (2023). Digital Forensic Urgence in Analyzing Electronic Evidence for Evidence of Criminal Actions in Information and Electronic Transactions. Journal of Development Research, 7(2), Process. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v7i2.238
Ajijola, A., Zavarsky, P., & Ruhl, R. (2014). A review and comparative evaluation of forensics guidelines of NIST SP 800-101 Rev.1:2014 and ISO/IEC 27037:2012. 2014 World Congress on Internet Security, WorldCIS 2014, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/WorldCIS.2014.7028169
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. Elsevier
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-Government. Social Science Computer Review, 26(2), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307304515.
Edwards, G. C. III. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Faizal, A., & Luthfi, A. (2024). Comparison Study of NIST SP 800-86 and ISO/IEC 27037 Standards as A Framework for Digital Forensic Evidence Analysis. In Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (Vol. 6, Issue 2). https://journal-isi.org/index.php/isi/article/view/717
Gronlund, N.E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
ISO/IEC. (2012). International Standard ISO 27037 "Information Technology-Security Techniques Guidelines for Identification, Collection, Acquisition, and Preservation of Digital Evidence. International Standard ISO 27037 "Information Technology-Security Techniques-Guidelines for
Identification, Collection, Acquisition, and Preservation of Digital Evidence, 2011, 9.
Jumroh, M. S., & Pratama, M. Y. J. (2021). Implementasi Pelayanan Publik Teori dan Praktik.
Kasmad, R. (2013). Studi Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Makassar: Kedai Aksara.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J. (1978). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Meyers, M., & Rogers, M. (2004). Computer Forensics: The Need for Standardization and Certification. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 3(2), 1-11. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:262563507
Moleong, Lexy J. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Pramono, J. (2020). Implementasi dan evaluasi kebijakan publik. UNISRI Press.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2014). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. McGraw-Hill Education.
Reith, M., Carr, C., & Gunsch, G. (2014). An Examination of Digital Forensic Models. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1(3), 1-12. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6759522
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/37518/uu-no-11-tahun-2008
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37518
Safie, S. I., & Bashah, S. R. B. M. (2024). Implementing ISO 27037 for digital forensics in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission: Challenges and solutions. 2024 IEEE 10th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA62563.2024.10675543
Setiawan, A. (2004). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Sudyana, D., Prayudi, Y., & Sugiantoro, B. (2019). Analysis and Evaluation Digital Forensic Investigation Framework Using Iso 27037:2012. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17781/p002464
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supardi, Supardi (2021). Mengukur Kekuatan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia p–ISSN: 2541-0849 e-ISSN: 2548-1398 Vol. 6, No. 5, Mei 2021. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i5.2724
Usman, N. (2002). Konteks Implementasi Berbasis Kurikulum. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
Veber, J., Smutný, Z., & Vyskočil, L. (2015). Practice of Digital Forensic Investigation in the Czech Republic and ISO/IEC 27037:2012. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 4(3), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.72
Veronika, V., & Simanjuntak, B. H. (2022). Implementasi ISO 27037 Dalam Pemeriksaan Investigatif Dengan Teknik Forensik Digital Untuk Memperoleh Bukti Audit Di Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (Bpk). Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 9(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v9i2.13343
Wahab, S. A. (2001). Analisis kebijakan: Dari formulasi ke implementasi kebijakan negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277
Zakariya, R., Prastia, Y., & Ismaya, S. (2019). Revitalisasi Pengaturan Penanganan Bukti Elektronik Dalam Proses Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia. In Jurnal Legislatif (pp. 134–150). https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jhl/article/view/10211
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reformasi Administrasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Please find the rights and licenses in Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani,on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy.
Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3. Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.
