Evaluasi Kebijakan Antikorupsi Pasca Berlakunya UU No. 19/2019 dan Implikasinya terhadap Kinerja KPK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31334/y5p1h455Keywords:
Policy Evaluation, Anti-corruption, KPK, Institutional Performance, Regulatory Backsliding, Brain Drain, Public AdministrationAbstract
The corruption eradication in Indonesia has faced fundamental challenges
since the enactment of Law No. 19 of 2019, which revised the legal bases of the
Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Although the policy was
normatively claimed as a form of strengthening, it has paradoxically led to
performance setbacks. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the impact
of the policy on KPK's performance, analyze emerging institutional
constraints, and formulate strategies for future strengthening. Using a case
study-based qualitative approach, this research integrates William N. Dunn's
Policy Evaluation Theory and Institutional Theory to analyze primary data
collected from in-depth interviews and relevant secondary data. The research
found that the policy revision has not demonstrated effectiveness in improving
KPK's substantive performance. Instead, it has resulted in systemic obstacles
across nearly all evaluation criteria, ranging from structural constraints
(structural executive positions) and internal cultural issues (ethical and
integrity crises coupled with brain drain) to operational challenges (red-tape
issues). Thus, based on these research findings, it can be concluded that a
phenomenon of Regulatory Backsliding has occurred, wherein formal legal
reforms have, paradoxically, functioned as instruments that diminish the
institution's substantive capacity. The policy has finally shifted the performance
orientation towards procedural compliance, leading to a significant decline in
public legitimacy.
References
Antaranews. (2024). Vonis Pelaku Pungli di Rutan KPK.
BBC News Indonesia. (2024). Sidak Etik Skandal Rutan KPK, Sebanyak 78 Pegawai Dijatuhi Sanksi Berat-’Komisi ini Hancur, Harus Di-install Ulang’.
Brown, C. (2018). Strengthening Jamaica’s anticorruption policy with an independent agency. Caribbean Journal of Public Policy, 3(2), 102–120.
Chetty, P., & Pillay, P. (2017). Independence of anticorruption agencies: A comparative study of South Africa and India. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(7), 513–524.
CSIS (Centre for Strategic and International Studies). (2023). Survei Nasional Kepercayaan Publik.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Canella, G. S. (2023). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sixth). Sage Publlications.
Dewan Pengawas, KPK. (2024). Laporan Tahunan Dewan Pengawas-KPK Tahun 2023: Jalan Terjal Mengawal Integritas.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge. Komnas HAM. (Laporan Pemantauan terkait Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan KPK).
Kompas.com. (2024). Dewas: 3 Pimpinan KPK 2019-2024 Disanksi Etik, 2 di Antaranya Dapat Sanksi Berat. Litbang Kompas. (Survei periodik).
Maolani. (2024). Evaluating Anti-Corruption Policies and Their Effectiveness in Strengthening Institutional Integrity.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge University Press.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 50 Tahun 2023 Tentang Tunjangan Kinerja Pegawai di Lingkungan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 51 Tahun 2023 Tentang Tunjangan Khusus Pegawai di Lingkungan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism (4th ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Pranoto, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2022). Tiga tahun reformasi kelembagaan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Analisis narasi kebijakan. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 12(2), 123–145.
PSHK & ICW. (2024). Executive Summary: Laporan Evaluasi Kinerja KPK 2019-2024.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019.
Rizal, A., & Wondabio, A. (2023). Analisis inkonsistensi antara kinerja dan kepercayaan publik pada KPK. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(4), 56–70.
Schorr, J., Carrasco, C., & Moya, P. (2024). Political elites, agency discretion and anticorruption governance in Chile. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 5(1), 89–110.
Suyatmiko, W. H., & Nicola, A. (2019). Menakar Lembaga Antikorupsi: Studi Peninjauan Kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS , 5(2), 35–56.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2023). Soal Independensi KPK dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi, Masihkah?
Transparency International Indonesia. (2025). Corruption Perception Index 2024. www.ti.or.id.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2012). Jakarta Statement on Principles for Anti Corruption Agencies. UNODC.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, A. (2021). Independensi KPK pasca UU No. 19 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(3), 88–104.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Please find the rights and licenses in Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy.
Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the articles editorial process is successfully completed. Abiwara : Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3. Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.
