Determination of Warehouse Performance Measurement Indicators at PT Pos Logistik Indonesia with The Balanced Scorecard Method

Authors

  • Adji Candra Kurniawan Logistics Engineering Department, Pertamina University, Jakarta
  • Ismi Nur Octaviani Harsono Logistics Engineering Department, Pertamina University, Jakarta
  • Nanda Ruswandi Logistics Engineering Department, Pertamina University, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v20i1.3120

Keywords:

Balanced Scorecard, Super Decision, AHP, Indikator, Perspektif,

Abstract

PT Pos Logistik Indonesia is a subsidiary of PT Pos Indonesia. This research focuses on PT Pos Logistik Indonesia Unilever Cakung warehouse, which later researchers will determine warehouse performance indicators using the Balanced Scorecard method. In the current conditions, the company only measures performance on employees and internal business activities and only focuses on one financial indicator. Therefore, it is necessary to have indicators that cover all aspects in realizing the vision and mission of the company. This study aims to compile appropriate indicators and propose additional indicators that need to be applied by companies for each perspective on the Balanced Scorecard method and determine priority weights for each perspective. The thing to do is to solve it by determining a strategy that is in accordance with the company's vision and mission that is adjusted to the company's activities, then by being able to determine suitable performance indicators to be implemented in the company PT Pos Logistik Indonesia. Then you can weight the interests of each performance indicator from four perspectives to find out which indicators are the most important to implement and prioritize. After calculating using Super Decision software, it is found that the customer perspective has a priority weight value of 0.333, the finance perspective has a priority weight value of 0.298, the internal process perspective has a priority weight value of 0.257 and the learning and growth perspective has a priority weight value of 0.113. The highest weight is on the customer perspective so that this perspective is more important than other perspectives

References

Agnia, E, M, and H Mubarok. 2017. “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi.†Jurnal Siliwangi Seri Sains dan Teknologi 3(2).

Alfeno, Sandro, Ferry Sudarto, and Ihsan Maulana. 2016. “Penerapan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Sebagai Model Penunjang Keputusan Penerimaan Mahasiswa Program Studi Ground Handling Airlines Pada Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang.†SENSI Journal 2(2): 139–53.

Berg, J.P.van den, and W.H.M. Zijm. 1999. “Models for Warehouse Management: Classification and Examples.†International Journal of Production Economics 59(1–3): 519–28.

Cahyaningtyas, N, P. 2023. Analisis Penyimpanan Dan Pengeluaran Produk Curah Kedelai Untuk Meningkatkan Pelayanan Gudang Pada Pt Sari Agrotama Persada Pt Wina - Gresik.

Chandra, Agung. 2014. “Pengukuran Kinerja Gudang Dengan Menggunakan Metode Balanced Scorecard – Studi Kasus Pada PT. GMS - Jakarta.†Jurnal Metris 15: 105–10.

Imron. 2009. “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Untuk Penentuan Sales Terbaik Studi Kasus : PT. Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia.†Jurnal Teknik Komputer 1: 127–34.

Kaplan, R, and D Norton. 1996. Balanced Scorecard Menerapkan Strategi Aksi Terjemahan: Pasla Yosi Peter. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kasmir. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori Dan Praktik). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kusrini, Elisa, Fadrizal Novendri, and Vembri Noor Helia. 2018. “Determining Key Performance Indicators for Warehouse Performance Measurement – a Case Study in Construction Materials Warehouse.†MATEC Web of Conferences 154: 01058.

Mulyadi. 2007. Balanced Scorecard: Alat Manajemen Kontemporer Untuk Pelipatgandaan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan, Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Pradipto, M. 2020. “Pengukuran Kinerja Dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard Pada Perusahaan Ekspedisi PT. CY.†Jurnal Optimasi Teknik Industri 2(1): 43–50.

PT Pos Logistik Indonesia. 2021. “Layanan PT Pos Logistik Indonesia.†https://www.poslogistics.co.id/.

Ruswandi, N, and I Sukarno. 2020. “Perancangan Fasilitas Gudang Dalam Sistem Logistik (Pendekatan Berbasis Laboratorium).†Jurnal Logistik Indonesia 4(2).

Saaty, T. L. 2008. “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.†Int. J. Services Sciences: 83–98.

Sedarmayanti. 2014. Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.

Sinambela, L., P. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Ke. Edited by S.(Editor) and R. D. (Editor). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Taylor, B. 2014. Introduction to Management Science. USA: Prentice Hall.

Warman, J. 2012. Manajemen Pergudangan Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta: PT Puka Sinar Harapan.

Wibowo. 2016. Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Yuwono, S, M Ikhsan, and E Sukarno. 2003. Petunjuk Praktis Penyusunan Balanced Scorecard : Menuju Organisasi Yang Berfokus Pada Strategi. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 1: March 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Please find the rights and licenses in Majalah Ilmiah Bijak By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

  1. License

The commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Majalah Ilmiah Bijak spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Majalah Ilmiah Bijak permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Majalah Ilmiah Bijak on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Jurnal Bijak will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Majalah Ilmiah Bijak will only communicate with the corresponding author.

5. Miscellaneous

Majalah Ilmiah Bijak will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Jurnal Bijak editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.

 

Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement"prior to the article publication.