Museum Retribution and Hybrid Organization: A Sustainable Funding Model for Cultural Heritage Preservation in Jakarta

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31334/exw98013

Keywords:

Museum Retribution; Hybrid Organization; Sustainable Funding; SSM;

Abstract

Museum retribution plays an important role in supporting the preservation of cultural heritage in Jakarta; however, its contribution remains insufficient to finance museum operations, conservation activities, and educational programs. This study aims to analyze the existing museum funding system using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to identify institutional problems, stakeholder roles, and fiscal constraints, and to develop a sustainable hybrid organization-based management model. A qualitative approach was employed through interviews with museum managers, field observations, and document analysis. Data were analyzed using the seven stages of SSM, including rich picture development, CATWOE analysis, conceptual modelling, and comparison between the conceptual model and the existing system. The findings reveal that the primary challenge lies not in the lack of revenue potential but in the bureaucratic management system, which limits managerial autonomy and prevents museums from utilizing their own retribution revenue. The SSM analysis further demonstrates that a tourism-oriented regional-owned enterprise (BUMD) operating as a hybrid organization provides a feasible institutional alternative by diversifying funding sources, strengthening stakeholder collaboration, and improving financial sustainability while preserving the museum's public mission. These findings contribute to the development of a sustainable museum funding model and offer policy recommendations for strengthening cultural heritage governance in Jakarta.

 

References

Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661

Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley & Sons.

Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. John Wiley & Sons.

Dinas Kebudayaan Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2022). Laporan kinerja museum di wilayah DKI Jakarta tahun 2022. Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gibson, C., & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: A critical review. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 tentang Retribusi Daerah.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta Nomor 10 Tahun 2023 tentang Pembentukan BUMD Jakarta Experience Board.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning the protection and promotion of museums and collections, their diversity and their role in society. UNESCO.

Yuliana, I., & Prasetyo, A. (2021). Kolaborasi pemerintah dan BUMD dalam pengelolaan pariwisata berkelanjutan di Jakarta. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Indonesia, 7(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.25077/japi.7.2.115-128.2021

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles