Public Knowledge and Private Gain: The Effect of Spillover Networks on Firms' Innovative Performance

Authors

  • Erna Herlina Universitas Pakuan Bogor
  • Rusman Ali Universitas Langlang Buana, Bandung
  • Fuadi Fuadi Universitas Serang Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v19i1.1973

Keywords:

innovation, knowledge spillovers, interorganizational learning, science intensity, downstream integration, semiconductor industry

Abstract

This research cores around presenting the idea of an overflow organization, to be specific an organization of source organizations whose public information is a getting organization that can be ingested and utilized as advancement input. The review was led utilizing patent-put together information with respect to a board of semiconductor organizations somewhere in the range of 1976 and 2002. The outcomes show that the imaginative presentation of the organization will in general be higher when the overflow network is plentiful or wealthy in underlying openings. Notwithstanding, great overflow organizations and opening wealth are primary for the most part counterproductive. It is steady with information that the worth of outer information inputs relies upon the venture level assets that can be pooled. Organizations benefit from overflow networks that rely upon specific variables, specifically intraorganisasi logical force and level of incorporation into (downstream).

References

Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.

Audretsch, D.B., Belitski, M., Caiazza, R. 2021. Start ups, Innovation and Knowledge Spillovers. The Journal of Technology Transfer.

Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don’t go alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 267-294.

Caldas., L.F.D.P., Paula, F.F.O., dan Silva, J.F.D. 2021. The Effects Of Knowledge Spillovers And Alliance Portfolio Diversity On Product Innovation And Firm Growth. International Journal of Innovation Management. (2021):2150051.

Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.

Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. 2005. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 332-345.

Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477.

Operti, E. dan Carnabuci, G. 2014. Public Knowledge, Private Gain: The Effect Of Spillover Networks On Firms’ Innovative Performance. Journal of Management. 40(4): 1042-1074.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational learning and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.

Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 369-386.

Yang, H., Phelps, C., & Steensma, H. K. 2010. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 371-389.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-10